GRANTS | 
Innovation and Incubator Grants from the University System of Georgia | 
Objective: Develop evaluative criteria and process for assigning the USG HIPs code (ZWIP) to Writing-Intensive Courses.
UWG does not utilize the USG HIPs codes for Writing-Intensive Courses (WICs). There is no university-wide process for identifying, evaluating and tracking WICs. Two colleges—The College of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences (CHASS) and The College of Mathematics, Computing, and Sciences (CMCS)—currently have a common discipline-specific writing (DSW) degree requirement. Students can also receive a DSW certificate for completing additional DSW courses. However, DSW courses in these two colleges are not assigned the USG WIC code. This project will develop a framework to code WICs across all UWG colleges and schools, using a common set of criteria developed by faculty and a process that parallels the successful coding of other HIPs at UWG.
Over the past ten years, UWG has been an engaged institutional partner in the USG initiatives to develop high-quality HIPs, create processes to code HIPs, and assess HIPs in relationship to student success. In support of this work, UWG faculty and staff have participated in national conferences and workshops on HIPs organized by AAC&U among others. UWG faculty contributed to the evaluation taxonomies that were developed during the initial stage of the USG HIPs coding process. More recently, UWG’s approved Quality Enhancement Plan (From Classrooms to Careers: Career Readiness through Experiential Learning) has supported the development of criteria for Work-Based Learning, Capstone Seminars, and Undergraduate Research, along with a faculty-led evaluation process for coding and assessment. Similar work has led to coding of First-Year Seminars, Service-Learning, and Study Abroad / Away experiences. Writing-Intensive Courses (WICs) represent the next step in the goal to develop criteria, coding, and assessment measures for all 11 HIPs.
Goals: 
1) Establish Criteria: Identify faculty from each college / school who will work collaboratively to develop criteria for writing-intensive courses based on national standards.  Criteria will be approved by the faculty senate.
2) Implement Process: Following the process already in place for other HIPs (work-based learning, undergraduate research, etc.), faculty will be able to submit courses via an online application to receive the WIC attribute. Applications will be reviewed by a faculty senate subcommittee, and once approved will be submitted to the Registrar for coding.
3) Develop Resources: Work with faculty from each college / school and the Institute for Faculty Excellence (IFE) to identify / design resources and host workshops to support WIC implementation. Resources will support faculty in the development of high-quality WICs.
4) Student Support: Design campus-wide communication to students (embedded in WIC courses) that helps students understand the value of writing to career readiness and learn about appropriate use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in relationship to writing.
Outcomes:
1) Process: An institutional process for coding WICs based on best practices of faculty governance and aligned with coding processes that are successfully used for other campus HIPs (work-based learning, undergraduate research, etc.). 
2) Quality: Work will ensure that all courses assigned WIC attributes meet the institutional criteria (based on national standards) for high-quality HIPs through a process of faculty evaluation and feedback. This will enhance student learning in relationship to writing and expand faculty engagement in helping students learn about writing.
 
3) Access: WIC coding will allow students (and faculty and staff advisors) to identify WICs and make appropriate choices for selecting appropriate courses that will support student proficiency in writing and in making connections between writing and career readiness.
Challenges: 
1) WIC Alignment: Two colleges already have an internal process for designating discipline-specific writing courses as part of a degree requirement. While this proposal will benefit from this foundational work, it also presents challenges. Approved DSW courses will need to add the USG code and be aligned with the WIC-criteria that will be used across campus by all colleges and schools. 
2) AI Integration: Artificial Intelligence currently is a major topic of discussion at UWG and across the nation in relationship to student writing. While the attribute process does not address AI directly, UWG plans to integrate into its WIC development process an AI curriculum, which will support student learning on the appropriate uses of AI in relationship to writing.
Coding WICs has a clear alignment with UWG’s institutional goals. Increasing student access to High Impact Practices is identified as an institutional priority in UWG’s current strategic plan. Two HIPs (work-based learning and undergraduate research) are the focus of UWG’s recently approved Quality Enhancement Plan. As described in Section II above, UWG has developed criteria for Work-Based Learning, Capstone Seminars, and Undergraduate Research, along with a faculty-led review for coding and assessment. Similar work has led to coding First-Year Seminars, Service-Learning, and Study Abroad / Away experiences. WICs represent the next step in the goal to develop criteria, coding, and assessment measures for all 11 HIPs. WICs represent the most significant gap in UWG’s HIPs inventory; of all of the HIPs that remain to be developed and coded, WICs offer the greatest opportunity for overall impact on student learning, career readiness, and professional success.
Two colleges—The College of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences (CHASS) and The College of Mathematics, Computing, and Sciences (CMCS)—currently have a common discipline-specific writing (DSW) degree requirement. Courses in CMCS and CHASS are assigned an internal code (WRIT), which is used to track courses that students complete to fulfill the DSW requirement. There are more than 60 discrete upper-division courses across the arts, humanities, social sciences, and the sciences that are assigned the WRIT attribute. 1000- and 2000-level courses are not eligible for the WRIT attribute since the DSW requirement focuses on upper-division courses for the graduation requirement. A needs assessment survey indicates that at least 40 other courses across the other colleges (along with additional courses in CHASS and CMCS) would be eligible to apply for the new USG WIC attribute (ZWIP). UWG will retain the DSW WRIT code for purposes of the CHASS and CMCS degree requirements. The ZWIP code will be used for courses that apply for the WIC attribute. We anticipate that most courses that currently have the assigned WRIT code will be eligible for the ZWIP code as well, even though the specific criteria–which will be determined by faculty representatives from across all colleges and schools—may be different. UWG projects over 100 courses will be eligible for the new WIC code. One goal of the process is to work on alignment between the USG and UWG codes. There are no plans to expand the DSW degree requirement to other colleges and schools.
Finally, the focus on WICs comes at an important time as institutions across the country struggle with the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on student research and writing. Faculty are struggling with how to structure writing courses in relation to the new realities involving AI and looking for ways to guide students in the appropriate use of AI. Expansion of WICs will also help students in making clear connections between writing and career readiness.
1) Criteria and assessment template for evaluating WICs to ensure they meet national standards for high-quality HIPs. Kuh (2018) notes that HIPs must meet specific standards if they achieved their desired outcomes (improved persistence, learning outcomes, graduation rates, etc). This means that certain conditions need to be met to set the right challenges, establish meaningful connections, and sustain the appropriate depth of engagement. To assist institutions with this work, Kuh identifies eight criteria for evaluating HIPs:
-Performance expectations set at appropriately high levels 
-Significant investment of time and effort by students over an extended period of time 
-Interaction with faculty and peers about substantive matters 
-Experiences with different cultures and perspectives 
-Frequent, timely, and constructive feedback 
-Periodic, structured opportunities to reflect and integrate learning 
-Opportunities to discover relevance of learning through real-world applications 
-Public demonstration of competence. 
2) Formal proposal to review and code WICs, submitted to Faculty Senate for approval. Will include organizational chart and work-flow process.
3) An online application form, submitted by faculty, which is reviewed for approval by the Undergraduate Program Committee of the Faculty Senate. Calls for applications will be posted during the fall and spring semesters.
4) Materials to support WIC workshops for faculty, communication templates for students, AI resources, and writing-to-career resources.