Skip to content Skip to navigation

South Georgia State College 2024

South Georgia State College, a state college of the University System of Georgia, is a multi-campus, student-centered institution offering high-quality associate and select baccalaureate degree programs. The institution provides innovative teaching and learning experiences, a rich array of student activities and athletic programs, access to unique ecological sites, and residential options to create a diverse, globally-focused, and supportive learning environment.
(SGSC Mission Statement, approved 2012)

In academic year 2023-2024 SGSC offered three associate degree programs (A. A., A. S., and A. S. in Nursing) with nineteen academic transfer pathways--and seven bachelor’s degree programs (B. S. in Nursing, B. S. in Biological Sciences, B. S. in Management, B. S. in Long-Term Healthcare Management,
B. S. in Public Service Leadership, B. S. in Elementary/Special Education, B. S. in Mechanical Engineering Technology). The former B. A. in Professional Business and Technical Writing was deactivated in January 2023 due to low enrollments.  Associate’s degree-level students comprised 66.3% of SGSC’s fall 2023 enrollment.

SGSC’s mission, completion priorities, and student body demographics clearly align.  The institution consistently enrolls primarily “traditional” students (84.6% fall 2023, excluding dual-enrolled). However, a variety of student-support services for all students is extremely important at SGSC, where for fall 2023 51.9% of all students were Pell Grant recipients (59%, excluding dual-enrolled), over one-third of entering freshmen were enrolled in an LS math corequisite course, a little less than one-third were first-generation college students, and 15.4% were non-traditional (adult learners).  Such student demographic data has led SGSC to employ Momentum Year/Mindset/ASPIRE strategies focusing on helping at-risk students to succeed and earn a degree, preferably at SGSC but also as potential transfer students to other USG institutions.

The “Enrollment and Demographic Trends” and “Underserved Enrollment Trends” tables (Appendix Tables A and B, respectively) provide a good look at the SGSC student body’s characteristics. In addition to the data in the tables, it is noteworthy that 91.1% of SGSC’s total fall 2023 enrollment were Georgia residents (typically SGSC enrolls students from approximately 70% of the 159 Georgia counties), 79.5% of fall 2023 enrollment was from ten counties in our region of Georgia, and 8.9% were from other states or foreign countries. The students represented in these enrollment demographics help “to create a diverse, globally-focused learning environment” (SGSC Mission Statement).

While this report focuses on AY 2023-2024 demographics, strategies, and metrics, it is helpful to present a clear picture of who we are as we have entered the current academic year; consequently, there will be some references below to significant fall 2024 enrollment trends for comparison to our five-year journey through resilience and transformation.

Navigating Enrollment Changes

South Georgia State College's journey over the past five years reflects a resilient institution that has faced significant challenges and adapted accordingly. From a peak enrollment of 2,346 students in Fall 2019, SGSC's numbers reached 1,853 by Fall 2024—a 21% decrease that tells only part of the story. This decline masks SGSC's efforts to stabilize and rebound after enrollment sharply dropped during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. By Fall 2024, enrollment has shown steady recovery, marking the success of SGSC's adaptive strategies in a difficult higher education environment.

Changing Student Demographics

The demographics of SGSC's student body have transformed considerably. Since the Fall of 2019, the Hispanic student population has grown from 8.35% to 11.49% by the Fall of 2024, underscoring SGSC's expanding role in serving Hispanic communities. This increase highlights both changing demographics and SGSC's broader appeal.
On the other hand, African American enrollment shifted downward, from 28.73% in 2019 to 22.50% by 2024. While the decline stabilized post-2020, it remains an area that calls for ongoing institutional focus and outreach. Meanwhile, the female student majority has not only held steady but slightly increased, from 66.75% in 2019 to 67.72% in 2024, presenting continued challenges and opportunities for recruiting and retaining male students.

Evolving Student Needs and Enrollment Patterns

One major shift has been the growing proportion of part-time students, which increased from 37.08% in 2019 to 41.20% in 2024. This trend reflects broader societal changes as more students balance academic goals with employment and family obligations. This shift suggests a need for flexible program options to meet evolving student needs.

Supporting Vulnerable Populations

SGSC's support for underserved populations reveals both progress and areas for growth. Since 2019, the percentage of Pell Grant recipients has declined from 63.30% to 57.65% in 2024 (excluding dual enrollment), potentially signaling shifts in the economic status of students or changes in financial aid access.
First-generation student representation also fluctuated significantly, peaking in 2021 at 42.60% before settling at 29.57% by 2024. These shifts point to both challenges and opportunities in supporting this essential demographic. Similarly, the proportion of adult learners has slightly decreased, from 18.90% in 2019 to 17.43% in 2024, suggesting further opportunities for program innovation and enhanced support services to better serve adult students.

Advancing Student Success

One of SGSC's most positive trends has been in student outcomes. Since 2019, first-year retention rates have improved from 46.3% to 52.5% in 2024, signaling the impact of support initiatives aimed at student success. SGSC's graduation rates also tell a story of progress, with three-year graduation rates rising from 19.1% for the 2017 cohort to 22.9% for the 2021 cohort, including a peak of 26.7% for the 2020 cohort. These gains underscore SGSC's commitment to improving student outcomes.

Shifts in Degree Production

Degree production at SGSC has evolved to reflect changing priorities. While total degree completions fell from 413 in 2019 to 352 in 2024, bachelor's degree awards rose from 69 to 102, suggesting success in expanding four-year programs. Meanwhile, associate degree production declined from 302 to 200, indicating both programmatic shifts and broader challenges.

Looking Ahead: Opportunities and Implications

This five-year journey suggests several important themes for SGSC's future:

  • Resilience in Crisis: SGSC has shown resilience through its recovery post-pandemic.
  • Demographic Shifts: The growth in Hispanic student enrollment and the decrease in African American enrollment present opportunities and challenges.
  • Part-Time Enrollment Trends: The increase in part-time students underscores the need for program flexibility and support services.
  • Positive Student Outcomes: Improvement in retention and graduation rates suggests effective student success strategies that can be further strengthened.
  • Focus on Bachelor's Degrees: The growth in degree awards may provide a strategic direction for future program offerings.

The past five years have underscored SGSC's ability to adapt to changing student needs while fulfilling its mission of providing accessible, quality education. The institution's resilience and dedication provide a strong foundation for continued growth and success.

Benchmark, Aspirational, and Competitor Institution and Student Achievement

In selecting a benchmark, aspirational, and competitor institution, SGSC focuses on performance in two specific areas related to student success. As required in SACS COC standards (8.1, Student Achievement), both areas are identified in the SGSC website’s information on student achievement. Because SGSC, like her eight sister institutions in the USG’s state college sector, is primarily an associate’s degree-granting institution with a select number of bachelor’s degree programs (see Mission Statement), the retention and graduation rate student achievement focus is on associate’s degree-seeking students. Among the measures included in SGSC’s student achievement goals are the following most significant college completion goals (achievement targets are discussed below):

  • One-year retention rates for full-time associate degree-seeking student cohorts, fall 2019 – fall 2023
  • Three-year graduation rates for full-time associate degree-seeking student cohorts, fall 2017 – fall 2021

Since SGSC is a member institution of the USG and is classified by the System as one of nine state colleges, all of whom have quite similar missions and follow the same USG directives, policies, goals, initiatives, and strategic plan, it makes sense to choose a benchmark, aspirational, and competitor institution from among the USG state colleges. That sector’s data on the bulleted student achievement measures above continues to identify Georgia Highlands as a high-performing institution in the state college sector and the benchmark, aspirational, and competitor institution to which we have compared ourselves since the inception of institutional benchmarking.
 
The data in Appendix Table C shows that the one-year institution-specific retention rate for SGSC’s FTFT associate degree-seeking students has remained consistent at a 50.4% five-year average from fall 2019 through fall 2023 cohorts, while the institution-specific average for all nine USG state colleges for the same period was 54.8%.  The Georgia Highlands average for the period was 62.3%, well above the SGSC and System averages.  SGSC’s goal is a one-year FTFT associate’s degree-seeking student retention rate of 55% for the fall 2025 student cohort. The fall 2022 and fall 2023 cohort rates of 52.9% and 52.5% are a good start from the 49% average for the prior three years.

While the SGSC-specific one-year retention rate for FTFT degree-seeking students has been consistently lower than the average for all nine USG state colleges, the one-year retention rate of former SGSC students within the USG over the five-year period averages 64.1%, while for the same period the average for all USG state colleges is lower at 61.7%. Given the A. A. and A. S. transfer mission of USG state colleges and the ease of transfer among USG institutions facilitated by a common core curriculum, it is significant that SGSC prepares students well for receiving institutions.  SGSC’s goal is to attain a one-year retention rate within the USG of 65% by the fall 2025 cohort.

The three-year graduation rate data in Appendix Table D compares the five-year SGSC rates to the average rates for the same period for all nine USG state colleges. “Institution-specific” refers to students graduating from SGSC, “System-wide for SGSC” refers to former SGSC students who graduate from any USG institution, and “System-wide for all state colleges” refers to students who began at a USG institution, transferred to another USG institution, and graduated from the USG institution to which they transferred.

The table shows that the three-year institution-specific graduation rate for SGSC’s FTFT associate degree-seeking students is at a five-year average of 20.8% (fall 2017 through fall 2021 cohorts), while the institution-specific average for all nine state colleges is 16% for the same period. USG by the Numbers reports show that The Georgia Highlands State College average rate for the five-year period 2017-2021 is 19 %, significantly higher than the average state college rate, but, for the second consecutive year in our college completion reporting, below the SGSC average. The rationale for an SGSC metric goal of a 25% three-year FTFT associate’s degree-seeking student graduation rate for the fall 2023 cohort is based on the fall 2020 cohort rate of 26.7%, which was the highest (by far) three-year graduation rate in the state college sector for the fall 2020 cohort.  Georgia Highlands had the second-highest fall 2020 rate in our sector (16.2%).  Still, SGSC must consider that our fall 2021 cohort’s achievement (most recent) dropped to 22.9%.

It is noteworthy that SGSC’s institution-specific graduation rate has typically exceeded the average graduation rate for all USG state colleges. In addition, the rate for the most recent student cohort of former SGSC students transferring to other USG state colleges (23.2%, fall 2021) far exceeds the average rate for all USG state college associate’s degree-seeking students transferring within the System (15.8%, fall 2021).  SGSC has definitely made significant progress in three-year graduation rates!

Student Success Inventory

The institutional environment underwent some significant changes, with interim administration over much of the past year, resulting in uncertainty in the future of some initiatives. Overall, we took advantage of the circumstances to identify our successes and our failures and to determine our best path forward. Key players in this work were Brandi Elliott, Associate Vice President of Student Success; Dr. Katy Dye, Assistant Professor of Biology; Sara Selby, Interim Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs; and Dr. Rosa Guedes, Professor of Biology

Throughout this year, we learned that when things went well, it was usually because the right mix of people worked well together, communicated well, were respectful of one another, and kept the best interests of our students as the focus. When they didn’t go well, it was usually because of too few people to get the job done or a lack of resources.      

In the year ahead, we will continue to promote our Boost Mindset workshops and interventions to encourage increased participation by students and faculty, as seen in the strategies for success template below. We are determining how that initiative can best be assessed and establishing a plan for continual evaluation and expansion. 

We are adjusting two of our goals to meld with our priority areas of at-risk students and collaborative advising.  The SGSC “Big Idea”:  Concierge Coaching for at-risk students was suspended for AY 2023-2024 due to lack of student participation after spring 2023.  No measures of success data could be collected.  Contributing factors include lack of student response to communications and availability of advisor coaches.  Due to budget constraints, particularly related to enrollment decreases resulting from the COVID pandemic, we currently employ only one professional advisor who works with students on academic probation and suspension, in-coming freshmen with a HSGPA of 2.4 or below, and VA students; an admin assistant who advises students in two of our bachelor’s degree programs; and an admin specialist who advises dual enrollment students.  Otherwise, the academic advising responsibility rests on faculty—with some assistance from Student Success personnel and the college’s registrar. We have also instituted a new advising pilot program that may impact if and how we reconfigure coaching. Support for at-risk students is still very much a priority area, but continued institutional improvement demands that we address services to all students, so if we continue concierge coaching, we will explore offering it to all students on an opt-in basis.

We have already adjusted our goal of creating fuller schedules and promoting completion of area A courses by establishing a Course Analysis Committee that has been making course scheduling recommendations that aim to support fuller schedules based on data and survey results. That committee will next recommend a two-year schedule of courses be made available so that students are better informed and can make purposeful choices towards timely program completion. That committee will also consider alternative scheduling options for students with learning support co-requisites to increase their opportunities for success.  This strategy is identified in the strategies for success template below.

Two of our top-level strategies have moved to a maintenance phase. First, because our undergraduate research Quality Enhancement Plan has now become an established part of our institutional identity, in accordance with the SACS COC intent of a QEP, we will maintain it, and it will remain an opportunity for expansion and improved assessment.

Second, the strategy to establish student connections with potential careers continues but has been significantly hampered by the loss of our fulltime career counselor position. We are relying heavily on Steppingblocks digital career exploration software, as well as Tutor.com, to provide a self-service experience for students. Student Success staff have been trained on how to refer students in need of career or pathway exploration to Steppingblocks. It was added to the website in Spring 2023 and to SOARs (new freshman orientation and registration programs). Student Success staff conducted faculty training on how to find Steppingblocks on the SGSC website and how to refer students to it. Examples of the kinds of data we can obtain on student usage are numbers of web sessions and topics; user activities; personality tests; sessions by location, weekday, time, module, and top searches. While career counseling continues, it is no longer one of our college completion strategies to be reported on in our annual completion reports.

For 2023-24, the two strategies for success taking highest priority were (1) “BOOST” mindset workshops/interventions and (2) improved course scheduling and advising. Information for those two strategies is included below.

Success Inventory

Boost Mindset Workshops and Interventions (South Georgia State College-2024)

Strategy/Project Name: 
Boost Mindset Workshops and Interventions
Momentum Area: 
Mindset
Strategy/Project Description: 

The “Boost” Mindset project, so named to reflect its goal to provide participants a boost towards academic success, embodies a series of virtual workshops to which every currently enrolled student has access via SGSC’s GeorgiaVIEW LMS. The series includes content about motivation, note-taking, time management, study skills, the neuroscience of learning, etc. Those students who choose to participate may earn certificates (for which some faculty offer incentives). In addition, a virtually-supported faculty learning community offers resources and training in instructional interventions, such as communication strategies, transparency, focused discussions, etc.

Activity Status: 
Evaluation/Assessment plan: 

Evaluation Plan and measures: 

  • Administering and analyzing student and faculty satisfaction surveys; determining student and faculty participation rates; comparing GPAs and retention rates of participants and non-participants

KPIs: 

  • Number/percentage of student participants, increase in participants’ average GPAs, and percentage of participants retained

Baseline measure (for each KPI): 

  • 2021-22  student participation was 6% in Fall and 19% in Spring; 2022-23 data showed participants in Fall had an average GPA of 3.22, 0.66 points higher than the 2.56 average of non-participants, and participants in Spring had an average GPA of 2.90, 0.19 points higher than the 2.71 average of non-participants; baseline measures for retention in progress.

  Current/most recent data (for each KPI): 

  • We are still collecting and analyzing 2023-24 data. Data from 2022-23 indicates participation at rates of 23% for Fall and 18% in Spring; GPA data from that period set the baseline (see above); and retention rates of participants have not yet been calculated.

Goal or targets (for each KPI): 

  • Participation goal of 25% each semester, an average GPA increase of 0.25 points for participants, and a retention rate of 40% for participants.

Time period/duration: 

  • Ongoing
Progress and Adjustments: 

The Grow Your Brain! Workshop on the neuroscience of learning was well-received and fueled planning for expanding the numbers and types of workshops offered. We also had good participation in workshops on Time Management and Motivation. Data on student workshop participation for AY 2022-2023 and AY 2023-2024 is in Appendix Table E.  We also continued to provide further training for interested faculty, including a faculty learning community session on “Finding Solutions” focused on communication. In addition, we ran a FLC that focused on specific mindset needs of our Valdosta State University Entry Program students. Student Mindset workshop participation dropped off some from the previous year, possibly due to continuing students choosing not to participate in a repeat workshop.  Consequently, new workshops are being considered.

Plan for the Year Ahead: 

Additional FLCs will be offered to increase faculty participation, which in turn can increase student participation. We continue to collect data on the effects on student achievement, but we must establish realistic baseline data for assessment.

Challenges and Support: 

Challenges: Limited physical and fiscal resources are always challenging. Tracking student progress has proven somewhat difficult.

Support Needed: Metrics dashboards could be very helpful in assessing effectiveness. Access has been requested but not yet established.

Contact email: 
Primary Contact: 
Katy Dye, Assistant Professor of Biology

Creating Fuller Schedules And Promoting Area A Completion (South Georgia State College-2024)

Strategy/Project Name: 
Creating Fuller Schedules And Promoting Area A Completion
Momentum Area: 
Purpose
Pathways
Strategy/Project Description: 

This initiative centered on training advisors to help students create fuller schedules (15 or more hours) and complete Area A requirements within 30 hours, aided by the use of scheduling tools and success markers in Navigate.

Evaluation/Assessment plan: 

Evaluation Plan and measures:

  • Review number/percentage of students enrolled in 15 or more credit hours; track number/percentage of first-time full-time students completing area A courses within 30 hours.

KPIs:

  • Rate of enrollment in 15 or more credit hours; rate of completion of area A requirements

Baseline measure (for each KPI):

  • Fall 2020 percentage of students enrolled in 15 or more credit hours was 17.01%; percentage of students completing area A courses within 30 hours was 57.04%.

Current/most recent data (for each KPI):

  • Fall 2023 rate of enrollment in 15 or more credit hours was 19.53% of total enrollment, significantly up from the Fall 2022 rate of 17.39% and close to the last pre-pandemic rate of 20.12% in Fall 2019; the Fall 2023 rate for area A completion within 30 hours for FTFT students has not yet been calculated; in Fall 2022, it was 69.25%., significantly up from the Fall 2021 rate of 57.66% but significantly down from the last pre-pandemic rate of 76.13% in Fall 2019.  All data can be found in Appendix Tables F, G, and H.

Goal or targets (for each KPI):

  • Percentage of students enrolled in 15 or more credit hours, 25% of total enrollment; percentage of students completing area A courses within 30 hours, 80%.

Time period/duration:

  • Measured each Fall
Progress and Adjustments: 

A number of factors, not the least of which was budget cuts that led to a loss of advisor positions and cancellation of the contract for the Navigate platform, necessitated a complete overhaul of not only academic advising but also course scheduling practices, all of which we are currently undertaking. The USG’s revision of the core curriculum structure contributed to the need for a new approach to advising that incorporates much more than creating fuller schedules and promoting area A completion. A Course Analysis Committee was formed to study course scheduling practices in an effort to insure that students have the ability to enroll in 15+ hours each semester, that course sequences are appropriately offered, and that students have enough information to make purposeful choices along their academic pathways. A new approach to advising with the collaboration of faculty and student success staff in a centrally located Advising Center is being piloted on the Waycross Campus; if successful, it will be extended to the Douglas Campus. Tools in the Banner 9 platform are being used to replace those lost when Navigate was discontinued. New program maps are in development. All of this constitutes a culture change for students, staff, and faculty.

Plan for the Year Ahead: 

Our Course Analysis Committee will persist in analyzing data, surveying students and faculty, and making informed recommendations on course scheduling. Faculty will be required to spend a minimum of one hour per week in the Advising Center to provide academic advising to students. Student success staff will provide referrals to services, offer skills workshops, and support students’ specific needs. We will reexamine our currently paused strategy of concierge coaching to determine if it should or could be improved and resurrected.

Challenges and Support: 

Major challenges include convincing mid-level administrators, some faculty members, and some students that recommended schedule changes are in the students’ best interests. Faculty buy-in is essential for the Advising Center model to be successful.

Scheduling software would be a great help to increase the effectiveness of our course scheduling practices.

Contact email: 
Primary Contact: 
Brandi Elliott, Associate Vice President for Student Success
Sara Selby, Interim Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs

Campus Plans Supplemental Sections

SGSC ASPIRE Top Five Strategies for Success, AY 2024-2025

As we have moved from AY 2023-2024 to the current academic year, we are incorporating three new ASPIRE strategies to complement our BOOST Mindset and course scheduling/Area A completion emphases. Data gathering and analysis begins in the current academic year. The top five SGSC strategies for student success identified in the spring 2024 USG ASPIRE initiative and now an integral part of our CCG/Momentum work beginning in AY 2024-2025, as well as related USG strategic plan goals, are identified in the tables below:

Strategy

Description

Outcome Measure

Measure Cycle

Point of Contact

USG Strategic Plan Areas

1. Provide students more choices in course scheduling

Course Analysis Committee will annually survey students, consult with faculty, and study enrollment trends to recommend course scheduling adjustments that create more choices of modality, time, place, and variety in course offerings.

% students enrolled in >=15 hours

Each fall

sara.selby@sgsc.edu

1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 2.5

2. Establish advising centers on both campuses

Faculty are required to spend a minimum of one hour per week in the advising Center to provide academic advising on an ongoing basis, and student support staff are assigned case loads of students for whom they provide referrals, conduct skills workshops, and address non-academic needs.

% FTFT AA/AS students retained after 1 year

Each fall

brandi.elliott@sgsc.edu

1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 2.5

3. Provide Mindset training and activities for students & intervention strategies for faculty

All students are directly enrolled in a course in D2L where they can earn certificates for completing virtual workshops on such topics as motivation, note-taking, study skills, the neuroscience of learning, etc., for which some faculty offer incentives. FLCs are offered to faculty who wish to explore various pedagogical strategies to encourage a growth mindset.

% student participants each year

Each spring

Kathryn.dye@sgsc.edu

1.2, 1.3, 2.5

4. Adopt no-cost and low-cost textbooks and course materials

Faculty are strongly encouraged to use OER and to support the Affordable Learning Georgia initiative to increase affordability for students.

% no-cost & low-cost course sections offered each year

Each spring

Sara.selby@sgsc.edu

1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 2.5

5. Establish articulations with other institutions, inside and outside the USG

Articulations with TCSG institutions beyond those approved by USG increase transfer opportunities.  Articulations with sister/senior institutions provide clearer pathways for AA/AS graduates to continue their studies. Articulations with graduate programs provide advanced study opportunities for baccalaureate graduates.

% retained in USG

Each spring

Sara.selby@sgsc.edu

1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 2.1, 2.2, 2.5, 3.1, 4.1

 

Strat. Plan #

Strategic Plan Area

Strategic Plan Item

1.1

Student Success

SS: Enrollment of Georgia students

1.2

Student Success

SS: 1-year retention rates

1.3

Student Success

SS: Graduation rates

1.4

Student Success

SS: Degrees awarded

1.5

Student Success

SS: Earnings of graduates

1.6

Student Success

SS: Other (describe)

2.1

Responsible Stewardship

RS: Average loan amount

2.2

Responsible Stewardship

RS: Cost of attendance

2.3

Responsible Stewardship

RS: Donations

2.4

Responsible Stewardship

RS: Operating expenditures per FTE

2.5

Responsible Stewardship

RS: Time to degree

2.6

Responsible Stewardship

RS: Other (describe)

3.1

Economic Competitiveness

EC: Collaborative programs

3.2

Economic Competitiveness

EC: Undergraduate research

3.3

Economic Competitiveness

EC: Research expenditures

3.4

Economic Competitiveness

EC: Research expenditures from federal funds

3.5

Economic Competitiveness

EC: Patents and plant certificates issued

3.6

Economic Competitiveness

EC: Business startups supported

3.7

Economic Competitiveness

EC: Other (describe)

4.1

Community Impact

CI: Retention of USG graduates in state

4.2

Community Impact

CI: Lifetime earnings premium of graduates

4.3

Community Impact

CI: Employee turnover

4.4

Community Impact

CI: Degrees awarded in key employment sectors

4.5

Community Impact

CI: Enrollments in experiential learning

4.6

Community Impact

CI: Other (describe)

Observations and Next Steps

The past year has taught us that if a strategy isn’t working, we need to admit that it isn’t working and decide whether it’s worth saving or if we should let it go. If it is worth saving, we must devise a strategy to do so, and we need the resources to make it successful. We believe that the strategies we are currently working on are particularly aligned with our institutional goal #3 of “improv[ing] student success rates as measured by course completion, retention, graduation and transfer to other post- secondary institutions after preferably attaining a degree from SGSC.”

In the year ahead, we want to refocus so that the successful strategies that we have initiated are expanded or maintained, and those that are unsuccessful are either abandoned or revised. We need to focus on fewer strategies to maximize effective use of our limited resources and workforce. Our priority areas for continued improvement are:

  1. at-risk students, because if we can identify their needs earlyenough to intervene and provide support, we can retain them and help them become successful;
  2. collaborative advising, because faculty and student success staff need to work together to provide the most effective holistic advising to ensure degree progression and timely graduation; and, as a new priority area,
  3. student engagement, because achieving learning outcomes requires active learning, and high-impact practices can relate to career-ready competencies.